New to Beyond Paycheck to Paycheck? Learn more about the blog and the book. You can subscribe to the blog via RSS or by entering your email in the box to the right for updates (each post has a link for you to easily unsubscribe).

Archive for September, 2008

In Wall Street Journal Sunday

You: You’re in the WSJ Sunday, but you wait until today to tell me?  Why did you wait so long?

Well, with the Internet it’s not like the article went anywhere - you can still view it.  Besides, the content of the article is timeless.

You: What’s it about?

Not willing to click on that link yet, huh?

You: Your link might have the vaguest description ever.

Fair point.  It’s a short piece called Don’t Try to Hide From the Turmoil which is geared to those who are just starting out in life and may be concerned about the current macro-environment.

You: Who isn’t freaked out?

Exactly.   We all are.  The difference is how you react to some of the natural anxiety. Take a look at the article and let me know what you think.  There are plenty of ways to take advantage if you can be intelligent in a sea of uncertainty.

Sphere: Related Content

Why does it always take a crisis?

Human nature is amusing sometimes.

You: Don’t you mean “amazing?”

Not this time.  Whether it be the health and safety of an individual or the foreign affairs or financial stature of a global superpower, it always seems to take a crisis for people to really start to care enough to put aside their differences in order to get something meaningful done.

You: And even then it might not happen.

Very true.  And of course, the fix is to the last or current crisis, setting the stage for the next one. . .

Anyway, it looks like they (Congress, the President, the Fed, the lobbyists, etc.) are going to work out a deal, but I’ve heard that before. We shall see.  I’m just glad I don’t have to work on that today.  You probably don’t either -  can you imagine a Congressperson reading this instead of working on the deal?  Get back to work!  I’ll take the ratings hit for the sake of my country.

You: You’re a true patriot.

Ha.  Anyway, consider taking a few minutes to read this week’s Carnival of Personal Finance hosted by Debt Kid.  In addition to my article demonstrating how the first time home buyer tax credit that isn’t really a tax credit, there are over 50 additional useful articles.  My personal favorite, albeit on the longer side, is Simple Dollar’s 12 biggest personal finance mistakes people make over and over again.

It’s a shame, but it’s true.  Better to learn from someone else’s mistakes, don’t you think? Take note future large economies of the world . . .

Sphere: Related Content

No good financial education?

I’m still shaking my head at this one.  In the September issue of Money Magazine, Lauren Willis argues Why you can’t teach money.

You: Who’s Lauren Willis? I never heard of her.

I hadn’t either. She’s a law professor at Loyola Law School in LA.  In the article, she maintains, among other things:

Sellers of financial products spend billions drowning out well-meaning messages to consumers from nonprofits or government agencies.

Now that can be true, but is it a reason to completely give up on financial education?  There’s plenty of people who are, unfortunately, still racist. Does that mean we should stop teaching people that the mindset is misguided?

Also, financial products are always changing - credit and insurance products have changed dramatically in the past 20 years - making it hard for educators to keep up.

Oh! I see: it’s too hard, so let’s no try.

It’s not like sex education. As far as I know, people get pregnant the same way they did when I was in high school.

I’m pretty sure that people get pregnant the same way too, but teenage pregnancy is way down. Might sex education have something to do with that?

I could go on, but I won’t.  Okay, I will.  Here’s the letter I wrote to Money Magazine that you’re unlikely to see published (but if you do, this is why it looks familiar):

Ms. Willis 1) opposes financial education by anyone other than parents, 2) thinks do-it-yourselfers are a bunch of overconfident poor decision-makers, and 3) doesn’t trust financial planners to teach ethically.  That’s a lot of strong opinions for someone outside of financial services.

While no industry is perfect, several fantastic financial educational initiatives that make an impact exist (along with several that do not).  Most do-it-yourselfers are far better off making their own educated decisions as opposed to doing so without any training, being forced into the safest choice (as determined by a bureaucrat), or yes, even via blind trust of a unethical salesperson. But, as MONEY has told us, there are plenty of fantastic fee-only financial planners out there if you know the questions to ask.

I’m glad you don’t agree with Ms. Willis’ thesis.  Otherwise, the September issue would probably have been MONEY’s last. I’m quite confident I’m not the only one who learns something from every issue.

Well you’re here reading this, a financial education blog, so my guess is that you either totally agree with me or you’re related to Ms. Willis. Do tell.

Sphere: Related Content

First Time Homebuyer Tax Credit: When a credit isn’t a credit but it’s still free money

Not surprisingly, government has found another way to make something that could be so simple so very complicated.

You:  How so this time?

The relatively new first-time homebuyer tax credit.

You: Did this just come out because of the most recent financial crisis?

Actually, it came out a few months ago before the most recent financial crisis.  But it was definitely added in response to falling home prices.  Here’s what you need to know:

Qualification

In order to be eligible for the first-time homebuyer credit, you must meet the following conditions:

  • You must buy a principal residence (not an investment property or a second home) after April 9, 2008 and before July 1, 2009.
  • If you file single or as head of household, your modified adjusted gross income must be less than $95,000 to receive any credit (and less than $75,000 to receive a full credit).  If you’re married, those two numbers increase to $170,000 and $150,000 respectively.
  • You must not have owned a principal residence during the last three years. Same is true for your spouse, if you are married.

Provided you meet all of the conditions above, here’s what the credit means for you:

Show Me The Money

Since the credit is 10% of your home’s purchase price but is subject to a maximum of $7,500, anyone who purchases a house costing $75,000 or more and meets the criteria above receives the same $7,500 credit.  Note, however that the credit is refundable. That’s huge.

You: Why?

The fact that the credit is refundable means that you can get the full $7,500 even if your total tax liability was less (or even zero). Many other credits are only actually payable if you would otherwise have a tax liability.

You: Okay, now in English.

Say your tax liability for the year is $1,500 and you had $2,000 withheld.  Ordinarily, you’d receive a $500 refund.

You: Easy enough.

Now, say that you’re eligible for the first-time homebuyer tax credit but that the credit was non-refundable.

You: But it is refundable.

Yes, but I’m trying to provide an example so you can understand the importance of the “hugeness.”

You: Right.

If it were non-refundable, your tax refund would increase to $2,000 because the credit would reduce your income tax liability to zero, providing you with a full refund of the entire amount you had paid through withholding.

You: But since, it’s refundable . . .

You get more.  In fact, you get the whole $7,500 credit.  The first $1,500 of it wipe away the tax you’d otherwise owe and the next $6,000 becomes “refundable.”  Plus, since you already paid $2,000 through withholding, the refund you’d actually receive would be $8,000.

You: That’s a huge refund.

Pun intended?

Then, The Government Takes It Back. Slowly.

You:  I don’t like the sound of that.

You shouldn’t.  What happens next makes the credit not really a credit and more of an interest-free loan:

Over the 15 years starting two years after you claim the credit, you have to pay 1/15 (or $500) back to the government each year.

You: What?  How?

You have to pay the credit back through a $500 reduction in your refund or a $500 increase in the amount due on each of 15 consecutive tax returns.

You: That doesn’t sound like a credit - it sounds like an interest-free loan.

It is. It’s just like the interest-free loan some people give to the government every year because of consistent over-withholding on their paychecks.  But this interest-free loan is a good thing because it’s you are the one who is not paying interest.  To be sure, an interest-free loan is not as good as a pure credit that you get to keep forever, but $7,500 is still a nice chunk of change in the form of an “interest-free advance” for the nominal effort of claiming it, if you are eligible.

Note, if you sell your home before the 15 years are over, you owe the remaining balance when you next file.  If, however, you sell your home for a loss, the government eats the remaining balance.  Same thing is true if you die before the 15 years are up.

You: They actually considered my potential death that when writing the law?

I wouldn’t say your death specifically but death in general:  yup

According to the web site Federal Housing Tax Credit, you could save over $8,000 in interest payments compared to likely alternative of financing the full $7,500 over 30 years  One last thing: if you know you’re going to qualify, don’t wait until April to get your money. Adjust your W4 at once or you’ll be giving the government an interest-free loan on the interest-free loan they are trying to give you!

Sphere: Related Content

From the markets to credit reports

What a crazy week it was in the market.  Yet, as you’ve no doubt heard, the Dow Jones wound up down less than a percentage point last week.  Yet with the extreme volatility, there was plenty of pain inflicted along the way.

Personally, I made no trades last week. None.  But trading volume was at records.  Sure, most of it was by Wall Street types, but it wasn’t exclusively so.  In fact, yesterday, while I was reading Friday’s Wall Street Journal -

You: Yesterday was Sunday.

I am aware of that. I have two small kids, remember?

You: Can that be an excuse for everything?

Do you have kids yet?

You: No.

Just wait.  Anyway, I was reading an article and it spoke about how one investor had sold a substantial percentage of his stock holdings at the opening on Thursday because he couldn’t stomach the losses.  Now, since this article was written on Thursday for Friday publication, what the writer didn’t discuss was the fact that this individual investor locked in his losses. He wasn’t around for Thursday and Friday’s enormous gains which, my guess is, will both be among the top 10 or 20 days of the DECADE. He missed them both because he timed the market. Bad move. (And I’d be saying the same thing if the market went way down Thursday or Friday. True, he would have been luckier, but it would still have been a bad move.)

But that’s enough about the market for today, because that’s all anyone is talking about. Carnivals are more fun, aren’t they?  This week’s carnival of personal finance was just posted by Sound Money Matters and featured my answer to the question What should I do with my raise?

The best other article out there for the week - a quick read and a reminder that no good deed goes unpunished - is Taking Charge’s post You are your own best credit repair company which shows (in a cross between a Top 10 list and bad poetry):

  1. You really do need to check your credit report
  2. From all three credit bureaus
  3. Once a year.
  4. You may find errors,
  5. You’ll have to do the research - yet
  6. Even if you’re right
  7. You have to get them to do their job.
  8. They probably won’t
  9. So you’ll have to do it for them.
  10. It will be worth it.

I wish it weren’t so. But it is.

Sphere: Related Content

Friday Q & A: What should I do with my raise?

It’s Friday, so it’s time for this week’s reader-submitted Q & A. If you’d like to submit a question, click here for more information or simply email a question.

I just received a significant raise and now I can afford to save more.  I already max out my 401(k) and a friend of mine said that the best thing to do now is to buy an annuity because that way I can get more tax-deferred growth.  But my wife’s friend told her a whole life insurance policy would be better since there’s an insurance component.  Last, a friend of mine at work says I shouldn’t do either; instead, he says, I should just get index funds.  Who’s right?

–Jonathan P., 26, Cincinnati, OH

Congratulations on your raise, Jonathan.  It appears that your increased income has made you attractive to a few others already.

Gary:  Indeed, I scour the “Movers and Shakers” column every week.  When’s the best time to catch you, JP?

While your dilemma may seem confusing, it’s actually not.  Let’s address a few points:

Tax-Deferred Growth

While tax-deferred growth is important - especially for long-term saving objectives like retirement - it is far from the only consideration. You must also think about risk, required return, ability to access funds in an emergency, fees/penalties, and so forth.  Both annuities and whole life insurance policies do promise the benefit of tax-deferred growth.

Gary: Amen!

However, so does an IRA.  With an IRA, you can invest in index funds, which will have very low expenses. So, if you are looking to save more for retirement and have not yet done an IRA, I’d start there.  (You should also consider a Roth IRA, which allows the benefit of tax-free growth.)

An annuity is seldom an appropriate product for a 20-something because of the lack of flexibility in the product and the existence of other greater financial priorities typically not yet met by a 20-something (including full funding of 401(k), IRA, emergency fund, etc.).  A whole life insurance policy is also not something relevant to a 20-something, especially one without any dependents. Life insurance is arguably the most important financial consideration out there - once you have a child (or, perhaps someone else) depending on your income. But if no one is hurt - financially speaking - by your untimely demise, you don’t need life insurance, and certainly not just to get the tax-deferred benefit.

But before you go ahead and put your money into an index fund, make sure you understand the goals for your money. If it’s for something long-term such as retirement, go ahead. But if you have not yet paid off all your high-interest debt, established an emergency fund, made significant progress towards a housing downpayment (or already own a home), I suggest starting in one of those places before putting more money in the stock market.

And be sure to continue to ask questions first, buying (perhaps) later.  You’ll never regret sleeping on a financial decisions.  If it’s a great idea today, it will still be a great idea tomorrow.

Sphere: Related Content

Looking for a little calm?

You: OHMYGOD!

The market?

You: No, the Yankees. Of course the market!

Calm down.

You: Are you calm?

Actually, yes.  I got pretty upset by a certain football game last weekend, but otherwise, yes, I’m calm.

You: Is this your whole “long-term perspective” thing?

Absolutely.  Assuming you’re not holding crap investments that are poor –

You: But how do I know if my investments are crap?

You mean “poor.”

You: Yeah, that.

Do you own AIG?  Lehman Brothers?

You: No and no.  But besides those?  I mean, who’s next?

I don’t know.  But here’s what to do: periodically compare your investments, such as your mutual funds, to their comparable funds and relevant benchmarks.  (As an extra incentive to hold index funds, you don’t really have to worry about this since they’ll always perform inline with their benchmarks, which, while admittedly not very good this week, makes it simple to monitor).

You: That’s right. Still, if I’m not holding index funds, gow do I do that comparison again?

Use your favorite web site, such as WSJ, Yahoo!, Morningstar. They’ll have the information for you.

Second, rebalance periodically, not just because the market is exceptionally volatile.

You: Gotcha.

Third, check out this article.  It’s a good one. Then have a glass of wine.

You: But it’s only noon.  Hey, is that your secret?

Well, it’s five ‘o’ clock in Europe, where the markets have already closed.

Sphere: Related Content

Who wins when your flight is delayed?

You:  The airlines?

No.

You:  The passengers?

You’re kidding, right?

You:  The bartenders?

Bingo!  My 8:50 PM scheduled flight departure Friday evening had an actual “wheels up” time of 12:55 AM.  That’s a pretty long delay, even in my extensive travel history.  But the good news was that I wasn’t stuck on the plane the whole time.

You: How did you avoid that?

Easy.  There was no plane - it was in Ohio.

You: And you weren’t?

Nope. I was in Philadelphia.  There’s one good thing about being out of town, I have learned, when it is raining cats and dogs causing your flight to be delayed.

You: One thing, huh?  That’s a longer list than I would have expected.  What is it?

The local baseball team has a good shot of being rained out.

You: So?

The Red Sox game might be on.

You: Ah.

So a bunch of us baseball fans passed a few hours watching the Red Sox game and came to the conclusion (confirmed by our friendly bartender) that heinous flight delays are a boondoggle for the bartenders, since people just sit around and drink like fish watch baseball.

Speaking of carnivals -

You: What?

Hey, I’m still tired.

You: Is that what you call it?

Yes. Fatigue.  So this week’s carnival of personal finance once again includes my article about Where will the next bubble come from?

You: We could use a bubble right about now.

Indeed, a crazy weekend on Wall Street and an interesting opening this morning.

While there are plenty of great articles at the carnival, you know I limit myself to one recommendation for the week (unless you find yourself with a heinous airport delay with plenty of Internet access and no beer baseball, in which case you can check yourself into a mental institution read the whole carnival).  Here’s the recommended article of the week:

Are You Throwing Money Away? Unused Expenses and Untapped Discounts

Take a look at both sides of the equation: 1) What are you paying too much for because you don’t actually need as much as you first thought and 2) What rewards have you earned that you aren’t using?   Personally, I’m pretty good at the first type, but this article served as a good reminder to take advantage of what I’ve already “won!”

Sphere: Related Content

More ways to save

It’s been a very busy week traveling the country teaching Life Lessons of Personal Finance.  Just now, I just had the opportunity to read this week’s Carnival of Personal Finance which, as always, has lots of fun postings.  While it was great to see that the host, BankerGirl, loved my analogy between football and savings, it’s always a challenge for me to pick just one other article to recommend to you.

But I got it done.

Read Squawkfox’s 50 Ways to Save $1,000 a Year.  There’s a lot of great ideas and many of them will allow you to live fiscally responsibily without being cheap.  As you know, that’s always an important consideration because they are not the same thing.  Just the other day, I listed five ways in which I am fiscally responsible and five other ways I am not cheap. It’s a fun little exercise you might wish to challenge yourself with.

Sphere: Related Content

Where will the next bubble come from?

I just read an interesting article in Fortune Magazine by Geoff Colvin.

You: How interesting was it?

It was so interesting that I would even link to it . . . if I could.

You: You can’t?

Nope.

You: Why not?

I found the table of contents to the magazine online, but with no links to the actual articles.

You: Why would a magazine have articles that can’t be easily read online?

Why does Radio Shack ask you for phone number when you buy batteries?

You: That’s Kramer’s line.

Indeed, a classic one, at least in my book.

You: Beyond Paycheck to Paycheck?

No.  I wasn’t being literal just then.

You: Sometimes it is hard to tell.

Sorry about that.

You: For real?

For real.

You: This is a long introductory conversation, don’t you think?

Probably, but –

You: Risky, no?

Not if you’re still reading.

You: Point taken.

Anyway, this Fortune Magazine article which, while we were talking I just found online is about how “Our easy access to plastic is about to dry up - and with it our ability to fake living the good life.” Mr. Colvin makes a compelling case that Americans have been able to consistently increase their standard of living despite limited (if any) increase in real wages.

You: How do we supposedly do that?

Simple: by spending more than we make.

You:  But you can’t really do that forever, right?  Don’t you eventually have to “pay the piper?”  I mean, you’ve got to pay the bills eventually.

Have you paid the piper yet?

You: This isn’t about me, I never talked to this Colvin fellow.

Okay, that’s your pass.  Colvin argues that, as a society, we’ve been quite resourceful in funding our lifestyles above our true means, first by borrowing against (or outright use of) the increasing value of our stock portfolios during the stock market bubble.  Then, after that bubble burst, we borrowed against the equity in our homes until –

You: That bubble burst.

Exactly.

You: So now what?

Credit cards.

You: Credit cards?  But credit cards aren’t an asset.

Right.  There’s nothing “there” to borrow against. No chance exists that your little plastic credit cards will go up in value, let alone by enough to offset the amount people borrow in their use.  Furthermore, use of credit cards has exploded recently.

You: Why do you say that?  Most of the people I know who have credit cards have had them for a while.

Now people are using those credit cards more and are more likely to be carrying over an ever increasing balance.

You: Almost like a bubble in credit card usage.

Cute.  But also accurate, because now the credit card debt bubble appears to be popping.

You: What?

Credit cards debt is now being traded for far less than it was formerly.

You: Wait a second - how can I trade my credit card debt?

So, you do have some?

You: Hypothetically.

You can’t trade your credit card debt.  But the banks that you (and/or your friends) borrow from - they buy and sell this debt with other financial institutions.  Now each dollar of credit card debt owed to the bank is worth less than it used to be because the banks expect that a lower percentage of this debt will ultimately be paid back than has been the case historically.

You: So what does this all mean?

Not surprisingly, credit card companies are beginning to reign in the amount that they will lend to cardholders.  This means that we’ll have less ability to borrow.

You: So where will people go next to borrow money they don’t have so they can continue to live a lifestyle that would otherwise be unaffordable?

That is the next conundrum. Mr. Colvin suggests that perhaps we may finally have to live within our means.

What a concept.

Here are two other takes on the matter:

The Death of the Credit Card Economy

Credit Cards: Not Dead Yet

Sphere: Related Content